My main question is who gets to decide when when the rounding rules are used and when exact change is given? For instance, can a store opt not to give a customer a penny if they have one in the till and instead round down to the nearest nickel? Can the customer pay only $0.40 even if the cashier can see that they have the two pennies that would be required to pay the $0.42 bill in full?
Presumably there isn't much that can be done about a customer deciding to pay with cash or electronic means of payment if one means of payment is more advantageous than the other. But still, shouldn't we at least think about this issue?
I guess the point of all of this is that if hacking/digital heist movies (cf. Office Space) have taught us anything it's that if you skim pennies from millions of transactions you may eventually end up with millions of dollars. Unfortunately I haven't yet heard how this problem will be resolved, or if it will be resolved, and which protections, if any, will be put in place for consumers and retailers (though I suspect that retailers are in a better position to make better use of these schemes than individual consumers).
Update: The following quote from a Globe and Mail story doesn't give me much hope that the aforementioned problems will be adequately addressed prior to the demise of the penny.
Ottawa says it won’t be policing consumer-business transactions, but added that “businesses are expected to round prices in a fair, consistent and transparent manner.”
1 comment:
Doesn't make any sense to me either. But it sounds like the consumer will lose on millions in incremental transactions each year.
It was in Superman 3.
Good for economy, good for growth. Hail, Hail!
Post a Comment