I am not sure who's more to blame

I don't understand why some media outlets continually choose to cover non-stories and then insist on turning them into negative stories.

I currently disgusted with a CBC story that deals with student speculation about parking limitations at MUN even though a new 870 space parking structure that opened today.

Maybe the most troubling aspect of the story is that most of the student opinions are nothing more than speculation.  The students quoted in the story simply don't know if there will continue to be parking problems once the new structure opens or if it may actually alleviate parking congestion around campus because the facility just opened today.  And even if all parking problems aren't resolved with the addition of this structure, are things not better than they were yesterday?

The tone of the story is also troubling.  Instead of focusing on the fact that the university is actually trying to alleviate student and staff concerns about parking this story adopts a negative tone and doesn't even really acknowledge the improvement to the parking situation that will arise because of this structure, which one might have expected to be the primary focus of the story.

To some extent, the way the story is framed here it all feels a little circular.  Wouldn't the natural response to these student concerns be the construction of a few parking garage?

Oh, and another problem is reporting on a real story but omitting the context and the pertinent details so most people reading will think it's a non-story and miss the significance of the whole thing.

Recent CBC coverage of the Labrador City housing shortage has done a great job of this.  Today's story about changes to the social housing eligibility income cap does a particularly great job of painting only a partial picture of the situation.

A story yesterday about bus accidents in Halifax was infuriating because they went so far as to request information about each Metro Transit bus accidents but then failed to put the numbers in a context that would allow one to reasonably judge whether or not the accident rate was reasonable or not.  With just a little more work this could have been a great story, instead it was likely more harmful than helpful as it sowed seeds of confusion rather than seeds of clarity.

And finally it's sticking

Though a few hours ago I mentioned that it was starting to snow, it seems that that was something of a false start.  The snow only lasted for a few moments before disappearing (with one minor return) until just a few minutes ago.

So a snowfall that didn't end up starting until 2:30 PM ended up being the reason for school cancelation.

I just saw a snowflake...

...so maybe this pre-emptive school cancelling will manage to pay off in the end (and I am getting the sense that it is snowing heavily more towards Annapolis Royal).

Anyway, even with the few snowflakes I have seen things really aren't even approaching flurries yet.

Update: And I know everyone reading this cares very deeply about the weather conditions in Wolfville, NS - why wouldn't they?

Yo, this is Ann Arbor!

Though I grew up in Newfoundland, both of my parents are from Michigan.  And though Michigan isn't the most populous or the wealthiest state it's residents and places seem to pop up rather frequently, or more than you might expect for a state of its size, in various media.  Because of my somewhat tangential connection to the place (and because it is still where most of my extended family lives) I always take note of these Michigan connections, even if knowing that so-and-so or such-and-such is from Michigan will likely serve me no real purpose in my day-to-day life.

A few years ago, just after I had started listening to This American Life, I learned that contributor Davy Rothbart (also of Found Magazine fame) was from Ann Arbor, Michigan.  When I eventually made it to the Found Magazine website I had a sneaking suspicion that the magazine's mailing address was on the same street as an aunt and uncle's house.

When I got around to asking about this they confirmed that while the Rothbart kids were a little older than my cousins they did know one another.  Maybe more importantly, my asking my cousin about this lead her to re-connecting with Davy.  I know that at one point here were plans to meet in-person, but I don't know if those plans ever came to fruition.

Then, just a few days ago, I happened to come across a relatively new blog, Yo, is this racist? that seems to be making waves on the internets.  I happened to learn about the blog through the author's recent Grantland piece on racist portrayals in sit-coms (though I can no longer remember how I ended up reading this article).

After reading the blog for a while I happened to come across the fact that the blog's author, Andrew Ti, seems to be from Ann Arbor and is about the same age as my Davy-Rothbart-knowing cousin.  I decided to ask if she also knew this guy?

Much to my surprise, just last night I found out that she does/did know this guy (though she said she really knew his sister more).

I find it very exciting to have a cousin who is tapped into things/people on the internet and doesn't even always know that she is until I sporadically ask her about people from her past.

The real problem I have now is how I might possibly extend my streak.  Is there anyway I can organically find a third Ann Arbor/Michigan person that my cousin knows who I can ask her about?  Taking my streak from two to three seems like it might be implausible, but then I thought going from one to two would be implausible.

Snow day?

As we were listening to the radio this morning we learned that the school children in the region (Kings and Annapolis counties) have been given a snow day.

So far things don't look too bad, but maybe they'll get worse?

Of course, given the latest satellite imagery (or at least give my reading of the latest satellite imagery) this seems a little unlikely (at least in the next few hours).

Unfortunately for the kids without school there isn't any snow on the ground and it's hovering around 0, otherwise this would be a perfect day for taking part in your favourite winter activity.

We're getting close

Montifax's 4th Annual blog-off is almost upon us.

Unfortunately, Neil seems a little less than excited.  Sadly, this isn't much different than past years.

I have found that one of the best ways to encourage Neil's participation is to handicap myself to give Neil a real chance of success.  This year I have decided to give myself more of a handicap than ever before - Neil's posts will now be worth 6 points to the 1 point that I get for each of my posts.  Hopefully this will provide Neil with enough incentive to participate.

And that we have a longer month of February this year should allow for additional blogging activity and more blog-off excitement than usual.

I hope that you will all remember to check back frequently during the blog-off to follow the competition and cheer on your favourite blogger.

This is surprising

Just a few minutes ago I decided to find some census data from the US.  I was mainly curious to see how much things had changed between the early 1980s and now.

While looking at the United States' Census' QuickFacts page I came across a few quick facts that surprised me.

First of all, who knew that the population grew by almost 10% over from 2000 and 2010?  That seems like a pretty substantial growth rate.

Secondly, who had any idea that even with the aging baby boomer cohort and increasing life-spans that people over 65 only account for 13% of the population.  This is all the more impressive/surprising when it is contrasted with the 24% of the population that is under 18.  Who knew there were so many young'uns out there?  Presumably this kind of population dynamic will mean a safe future for Social Security?

Finally, apparently only 85% of those over 25 have graduated from high school in the United States.  This seems a little low to me, but what do I know.

Three ingredient bread pt. 7

Well, today's bread project has now drawn to a close - and I feel pretty comfortable deeming it a success.

While the bread doesn't have an overwhelming pumpkin flavour, it certainly does taste like a little more than just white bread (in a very good way).  Furthermore, eating a few slices will provide you with a serving of vegetables.  If I had just slipped some protein in this loaf would practically be a balanced meal.

The only problem with this dream recipe being a success is that I am already thinking about other foods that I might use to make waterless three ingredient breads.  Raspberries came to mind first, but just a few minutes ago Nutella popped into my head as a potential ingredient (or maybe raspberries and Nutella for a four ingredient waterless bread).

Whatever happens with these future attempts to make waterless breads I will at least know that I did have at least one successful attempt.

Three ingredient bread pt. 6

So it at least kind of looks like bread.

Even if I did slightly over-bake it.

The real test will be what it looks like on the inside (and what it tastes like).

So far it looks as though it might actually be something approaching a passable result.

Three ingredient bread pt. 5

After a seeming unending period of rising, the liquid-less pumpkin dream bread was finally approaching a level of risen-ness I was comfortable with.

Obviously, I then placed the risen dough in the oven.

Placing the dough in the oven reminded me how dirty our oven door window is.  Gross.  I need to get on this cleaning project soon.

Oh, and while I was fooling around with this project (and doing some work), Jeannette baked and iced another batch of vegan cupcakes. 

This batch is chocolate-zucchini with chia seeds replacing the eggs.  Unfortunately I have an issue with zucchini so I won't be able to try them, even though they look great. 

Three ingredient bread pt. 4

There, I did it.  I rolled the bread dough into something approximating a baguette shape.  Now I will let it rise for a while and then stick it in the oven.

It was actually a little stickier than I expected.  This is something I am hoping bodes well for this loaf, of course I am also hoping that there will be enough gluten to hold the whole thing together.

Three ingredient bread pt. 3

So the bread is still rising slowly.

I am starting to think I am about read to roll it into a baguette shape and just throw it in the oven.

This is definitely looking as though it was worth my while (and the ingredients).

Three ingredient bread pt. 2

Well, my no-real-liquid added/recipe-came-from-a-dream bread is progressing somewhat slowly.  The rising process seems to be taking a little longer than I might have expected given the sugar in the pumpkin puree.  Maybe the fact the puree was cold when I started is the reason for the slow gas creation?

Shortly after this photo was taken I was able to knead in a little more flour.  I am thinking I may try to repeat this step a few more times.  I am worried that if I don't get enough flour into the puree that the who thing may not stick together.

At least I started with a small batch.

Three ingredient bread pt. 1

Last night I had a dream, a very unexciting dream.  I dreamt that, like the French, I could make a three ingredient bread.  Unlike the classic French bread recipe my bread would not have water, flour, and yeast but pumpkin puree, flour, and yeast.  As far as crazy dream recipes go, this one at least seems not to be entirely implausible.

Well, I am now in the midst of turning my dream into reality.

I'm pretty sure this is exactly what people are talking about when they talk about hoping their dreams will come true.  

Does the romance novel have a non-fiction equivalent?

Romance novels are everywhere in North America.  New or used, they are easy to come by.  Obviously they are filling some kind of demand.

But let's say you want something that's accessible, cheap, and easy to read that's also non-fiction what are the options?

My first thought is that the newspaper might be the non-fiction counterpart of the romance novel, but I am not entirely satisfied with that comparison.  Maybe magazines?

In the end magazines and newspapers both have the problem that their articles are much shorter than a romance novel, and I guess I am looking for something that is about as long (a very arbitrary requirement I know).

Is it possible that the romance novel just doesn't have a non-fiction analog?  Is such a thing needed?  Could we create something to fill this void?

A Few Quick Notes 559

-When I woke up yesterday it was close to -13 or -14.  By the time I went to bed last night the temperature was hovering around 0.  Today we reached a high of 11.  You may not be surprised to learn that the snow we received on Friday is now gone.

-This evening I borrowed a bread cookbook from my local public library.  Of course, I didn't even remember to consult this cookbook before beginning this evening's bread baking exercise (I ended up just going for a pumpkin/molasses/whole wheat/multigrain improvisation).

I may not be good a following recipes, but at least I am getting much better at making just one loaf of bread at a time.

-Listening to actors talk about acting is the worst, it's probably even worse than listening to pop musicians talk about what their music is about.

-Thanks to some inside info from my father about the relationship between meat consumption and kidney stone formation I have recently drastically reduced my consumption of meat.  So far I have been surprised how easy this has been to do, and how cheap.  If I learn to make it to foods more nutritious than rice it might even be healthy!

-Check out the hot plane puns the Judiciary Committe made in the title of its 2006 report on the Air Marshal's dress code.

How can it be so versatile?

I can't stop thinking about cotton and its various uses in clothing and other products.

Obviously I'm not the only one thinking about it.



[Embedded video]

Baking update

When I posted yesterday about the weird chickpea based cake that I made last night I probably came to a few hasty conclusions based on incomplete knowledge.  Now that the cake is a few hours older I think I am in a better position to judge the recipe.

First of all, the cake definitely needs time to set.  I would guess that the 40 minutes suggested for baking is really fine.  Any gooeyness that I experienced last night was likely just because I didn't give the cake time to cool and set.  When I came back to it today the centre was not the least bit gooey.

Secondly, as the cake seems designed to be accessible for those with restricted diets the recipe is on the sparse side ingredientwise.  I think an easy way to really improve the cake would be to add a few walnut or pecan pieces, though this wouldn't work if you were preparing it for someone with a nut allergy.

This is definitely a recipe I will make again, if mainly for the novelty factor and to test my hunch about the  addition of nuts.

Oliver Sacks agrees (or is it the other way around?)

For the past few days I have been haphazardly picking at Oliver Sacks's The Man Who Mistook his Wife for a Hat (a book I first started reading in 2003).

Last night, while reading the section on Tourette's Syndrome I was struck by his discussion of a concept that seemed to parallel something I posted about a few days ago - our inclination to overlook concepts/ideas that aren't appropriately named.  Of course, Sacks's take on concepts without names, or johnny-come-lately re-remembered names, is a little more elegant than mine.

The day after seeing Ray, it seemed to me that I noticed three Touretters in the street in downtown New York.  I was confounded, for Tourette's syndrome was said to be excessively rare.  It had an incidence, I had read, of one in a million, yet I had apparently seen three examples in an hour.  I was thrown into a turmoil of bewilderment and wonder: was it possible that had been overlooking this all the time, either not seeing such patients or vaguely dismissing them as 'nervous', 'cracked', 'twitchy'?  Was it possible that everyone had been overlooking them?  Was it possible that Tourette's was not a rarity, but rather common - a thousand times more common, say, than previously supposed?  

Sacks also includes a nice footnote with another example of such an instance.

A very similar situation happened with muscular dystrophy, which was never seen until Duchenne described it in the 1850s.  By 1860, after his original description, many hundreds of cases had been recognised and described, so much so that Charcot said: "How come that a disease so common, so widespread, and so recognisable at a glance - a disease which has doubtless always existed - how come it is only recognised now?  Why did we need M. Duchenne to open our eyes?"

I can't help but wonder how many unnamed concepts are floating about whose naming would be of great use in my day to day life?

Branching out

Earlier tonight I baked a gluten-free/vegan chocolate chickpea cake.

Jeannette convinced me that instead of posting about it here (even though I wasn't really leaning in that direction) that I should write a 'guest post' on her blog.  To facilitate domestic harmony I created the suggested post.

For a 'cake' without flour, eggs, or added oil this thing is pretty tasty.  Oh, and as it is mostly chickpea it is probably higher in protein than most cakes you run across in your day-to-day life.

A Few Quick Notes 558

-On Thursday we received about 10-12 centimetres of snow in just a few hours.



[Embedded video]

By yesterday afternoon/evening the snow was almost completely gone and it was almost 10.

Though Environment Canada is suggesting that it is currently about 1 in the region, I don't believe this. The continuing formation of ice suggests to me that it is at least below freezing and that it has been for a while.

Anyway, temperatures and conditions have definitely been yo-yoing recently and it is less than fun.

-Tonight Jeannette and I will be attending an Old Man Luedecke concert in Windsor.  The question on everyone's mind surely is whether or not he will perform the crowd favourite Joy of Cooking?




[Embedded video]

-I think I will be making some leek and potato soup shortly.  Much to my surprise, we were able to buy both leeks and potatoes at our local farmer's market.

Gwynn-eh-a Pigg

A few days ago I couldn't stop thinking about "Gwynn-eh-a Pigg."  It was stuck in my head and I didn't know why.


Fortunately, after a few days of thinking and speaking this phrase I remembered the source - an episode of the Kasper Hauser Comedy Podcast.

Shortly after coming to this realization I remembered another episode of their's, this one dealing with spicy pony heads and I couldn't help but think it might be something that Kirsten would like.

Finally, some coverage of an issue close to my heart

For some time I have been concerned about the contemporary mainstream media practice of including content that journalists know to be untrue in their stories.  The situation frequently arises when a public figure says untrue and is then quoted, without a qualifying statement, by the media outlet.  To feign ignorance or simply fail to deal with such untruths, at least to me, seems to undermine the utility of the whole venture of journalism.

For quite a while I have had the sense that this is an issue that has been completely sidestepped by the mainstream medeia.  They just aren't interested in dealing with the issue and challenges that would be sure to crop up if such an approach were to be adopted.

My opinions on the issue aside, it seems that today an editor at the New York Times finally wondered if their readers were interested in having reporters actually try to alert readers of known falsehoods or claims of questionable validity.

Perhaps not surprisingly, at least based on an assessment of the article's highest rated comments, readers do seem to be interested in having their news sources call out politicians when they tell lies.  Most people seem to think that a news source isn't much of a news source if it doesn't accomplish this basic task.

Anyway, though the story was only posted this morning more than 250 comments have been logged and commenting further commenting has now been halted.

I suspect that they have attracted more of a response to this piece than they expected.

Anyway, I am curious to see how the paper responds to this uproar (as the editor's piece leaves the impression that they knowingly include false statements that they make no effort to correct in their paper on a regular basis).  Given the immediate web uproar surely at least a follow-up comment will be made?

On the Media lead me to this response to the original NYT piece.

Funny timing

Given my last post I thought it was funny that this afternoon I should happen to find in my RSS feed a report about the future of Via Rail.

A concept lacking a name

In Canada, as well as a few other Commonwealth countries, the term 'Crown corporation' is used to describe a set of entities owned by the state but run somewhat independently.  Good examples of Crown corporation in Canada include things like CBC or Via Rail.

Not surprisingly given the inclusion of the word 'corporation' in the term, these entities are often means through which the state can participate in economic activities.  In some instances these corporations almost look like their private counterparts while in other instances it is clear that they are government own entities.

So even though Crown corporations may be of provincial or federal origin, the term provides a sense of clarity about their origins and relationship to government.

When discussing similar entities I immediately encounter two problems.  Firstly, if such entities can't be called 'Crown corporations' what can they be called?  'Government-own corporations' is an entirely unsatisfying name.  And, secondly, because there is no unifying descriptor they don't seem to discussed in the same way.  I know that I often forget how many government owned entities exist is the US because we almost never hear discussion of the entire class of entities in the way that we do in Canada.

I can't help but wonder how political discourse would change in the US if there was an easy and accessible way to talk about the class of entities which includes Amtrak, the USPS, and the FDIC, just to name a few.

(Maybe it doesn't matter, but I find it funny that Amtrak and the USPS use .com domains while the FDIC has a .gov domain.)

Red sky

Jeannette just reminded me old sailing aphorism "Red sky at night, sailor's delight.  Red sky in morning, sailors take warning."

Now I guess we get to wait and watch the day's weather conditions.

A Few Quick Notes 557

-The temperature has been yo-yoing for the past few weeks.  For instance, yesterday we had a high of 5 while it is currently -13.  Apparently it is to be 10 on Friday.  Between now and Friday we are to have a series of different forms of precipitation starting with snow and ending with rain.  Sounds fun doesn't it?

-As Jeannette noted yesterday, we are currently in the midst of pomelo and blood orange season.  Is there a better time of year than a time of year when you can have a pomelo a day?

I think not.

-For better or worse it seems that to coincide with the beginning of a new season of Republic of Doyle a few new pitches have been posted at Doyle Pitches.  I suspect that the goal this year is, as Spike Lee almost said, "Mo' Better Pitches."

-Just days after I included a post about my podcast listening habits one of the individuals responsible for many of my listening habits also posted about his podcast listening habits.  Of course, Jesse Thorn's post includes a few more details about each of the podcasts he listens to than my post (one might even go so far as to say that it is informative).   What Jesse's post lacks, at least in comparison to mine, is an image that charts his development at a podcast listener.  I mean, really, who creates such a list without an accompanying info-graphic.  How gauche.

(I'm just glad tone comes across so clearly in electronic communications.)

Free parking in Halifax

As I have recently mentioned a few times, I just listened to the entire episode archive of the 99% Invisible podcast.  One of the first episodes of this show (but one of the last that I listened to) dealt with a new parking initiative that was being implemented in San Francisco.


99% Invisible-08- 99% Free Parking by Roman Mars

[Embedded audio]

The general parking scheme to be implemented in San Francisco, at least as described in the podcast, was to create a system that encouraged a more efficient use of available parking space (their goal is to always have one free space per block).  A key component of creating such an outcome is to have dynamic pricing that reflects usage.  Higher prices in high demand areas and lower prices in low demand areas.  Furthermore, such prices would change regularly to reflect changing usage patterns. (You can read more about the system at the SFPark.org site.)

Anyway, I was reminded of these concepts and ideas as I read a recent CBC article about planned changes to parking rules in Halifax.  Instead of dealing with parking congestion problems with an approach reminiscent San Francisco's, Halifax seems interested only interested in implementing a course permitting scheme that will be of the most benefit to homeowners on residential streets (who are currently complaining about the lack of available parking space on their streets).

Maybe I should take a second to step back and describe the parking situation as it exists on the non-campus streets near Dal, the province's largest university and an institution with a relatively well documented parking shortage.  What is immediately striking about parking near Dal is not that there are no available spaces, but that there are many near-empty streets with available on-street parking.  These streets have almost no cars because complicated no parking schedules (things like two hour maximums or absolutely no parking between certain hours) make them difficult to use for most people with commitments at Dal.  Of course, I should also note that the few completely unencumbered parking places are almost always taken.

So getting back to the new proposal, if streets in Halifax are uniformly converted from free parking to permitted parking a few problems may arise.  Firstly, streets that are now almost completely empty may fill up with newly permitted cars (making some aspects of the problem worse).  Secondly, homeowners will now have to pay for the privilege to park near their homes (though they will have reduced rates).  Thirdly, those with irregular commitments in areas impacted by the changes may have a harder time parking as they won't have a parking permit for the area in question (this is the change that really bothers me as it will likely impact me when I am trying to go to Dal).

But that brings us to a few questions: Do we have an inherent right to free on-street parking? and Do homeowners have an inherent right to street parking in front of their property?  I guess my initial response to both of these questions is 'no.'

Lets deal with the first question first.  As much as I like free on-street parking and as much as I think it is a reasonable thing municipality to decide to provide, I think one can make a pretty convincing argument that as streets that are wide enough to allow for on-street more parking cost more to build that such costs should be recouped from those using the service rather than the entire tax base.  Similar approaches are taken with regards to things like gas taxes or bridge tolls.  Thus a pay-for-parking approach isn't completely outside the norm in most North American contexts.

Now on to the second question.  Though homeowners in residential area might like to be able to park in front of their homes I'm not really sure that they really have much an argument beyond that.  If we look at cases of property ownership in areas of dense development we often see that there isn't enough room for all owners to take advantage of on-street parking, options other than parking in front of one's building must be found.  Thus I don't see that the home owners in Halifax should really have much of a claim to the on-street parking in front of their homes (particularly during business hours).  It should also be noted that as a property owner you can both choose how to allocate your property (such as how much of your property is dedicated to parking) and decide whether or not you own a car.  Expecting to also have some claim to street space for which you have not paid and that is not equally available to all property owners or residents seems a bit much to me.

Of course, the other part of the equation that has been seemingly completely ignored, at least if we use this CBC article as our only source, is that attempts could be made to reduce the number of individuals interested in parking in Halifax.  Maybe a better bus system or efforts to decrease sprawl might also help with parking problems.

I guess, in the end, I think that this policy is missing the point.  People parking on the street is fine, there is nothing inherently wrong with it (though a few parking garages and a more effective pricing scheme might not be completely uncalled for).  Furthermore, if you don't provide alternatives to street parking (either parking-wise or alternatives to driving) you won't really solve the problem, you might just shift it further afield.  And I suspect that in the best case scenario that is all this policy will do as they fundamentally haven't done anything to reduce the need for parking.

100% cotton?

For maybe the past four months or so I have been thinking about the composition of the material used in the construction of my clothing.  For the most part, though I don't have any particularly good reason for this decision, I have generally been trying to veer away from synthetics.  The result is that sometimes in the morning when I am selecting my clothing I happen to either examine a label or run through my mental list of natural fibre shirts.

Today was one of those mornings when I thought about such issues.  After some vacillation I ended going with a cotton/synthetic blend shirt, mainly because I hadn't worn the shirt since I started thinking about synthetic fibres and that seemed a little unfair to a shirt that I had purchased before I started caring about such things.  What had this shirt ever done to cause me to question my trust in it?  Had it not always met my expectations in terms of shirtiness?

So all day I quite self-conscious about the fact that I wasn't wearing a 100% cotton shirt.  It was weighing on my mind more than it should have been.

Late this afternoon, just as I was becoming comfortable with this morning's clothing choice I saw someone looking at my shirt.  He then asked "Is that 100% cotton?"

Really?

Who asks that question of anyone, let alone someone to whom they are not particularly close?  And why?  Does anyone really need to know that they are perfect at detecting 100% cotton shirts?

Anyway, now that I know people are thinking about the composition of my shirts I am sure that I will be a little more self-conscious about it (whether I should be or not).  Do I really want to be exposed more than once as someone who doesn't wear 100% cotton shirts?  What kind of animal would they think I am?

From This American Life to This is That

For a while I have been interested in creating a graphic representation of development of my podcast listening habits.  In particular, I was interested in looking at the podcasts that I have started listening to either directly because of This American Life or because of podcasts that I started listening to because of other podcasts I had started listening to because of This American Life.

Anyway, last night I got around to sketching out a rough diagram (which I then converted into the image below today). 

I'm sure this image will be as helpful to you as it will be to me.

Note: The Sound of Young America has received credit for referring some podcasts that I actually started listening to because of the Maximumfun.org Podthoughts column.  Also, I know that The Sound of Young America is now called Bullseye, but it was the original incarnation of the show that lead me to these other podcasts, not the one episode of Bullseye that currently exists.

Different takes on the same announcement

Earlier today the Government of Nova Scotia announced the details of a new MOU with the province's universities.  I gather that in general austerity is the theme of the announcement (with $25 million in funding specifically dedicated to cost cutting - however that is supposed to work).

Of course how the province is presenting this announcement is a little different than some media sources.  To demonstrate the difference I thought it might be fun to provide the first paragraphs from a sources covering this issue.

To start, here is the first paragraph from the government's news release:

A three-year memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the province and Nova Scotia's 11 universities will ensure tuition remains at, or below, the national average, increases research and development opportunities, and invests $25 million in universities to help them become more sustainable.

 From the Metro's story on the topic:

The Nova Scotia government will allow tuition fees to rise by three per cent a year while reducing its grant to universities.

From the Chronicle Herald's story:

Nova Scotia universities will see a three per cent cut in provincial funding, Labour and Advanced Education Minister Marilyn More announced this afternoon.  

 From the Globe and Mail's story:

The Nova Scotia government will allow tuition fees to rise by three per cent a year while reducing its grant to universities.

(As you may haven noticed, there is a striking similarity between the Metro and Globe and Mail paragraphs.  Though the stories had different headlines it seems that they both just re-issued the Canadian Press story.)

I guess the media wasn't too interested in going with the province's take on things in this case.

Vegans are my favourite vegetarians

I’m not always so hot on vegetarianism generally (especially those ‘vegetarian’ diets that consider fish to be an acceptable food for a vegetarian), but I tend to think that veganism is pretty great.  Not only have they fully committed to the ‘no animal products’ position, but so many of the foods I do my best to avoid are also avoided by vegans.  Because of these dietary similarities I always feel that I have a special bond with vegans and, thus, I do my best to accommodate their needs whenever I preparing foods for vegans.  Even if there are no vegans present, if I have prepared a vegan meal I will often make a point of announcing it to those present (and I will then try to remember the recipe in case I need to prepare food for a vegan in the future).

Given my feelings towards vegans I thought I should come up with a (hopefully only) mildly insulting and very personal list of the six best things about vegans/veganism.

6) Vegans tend to read labels and know what they are eating.  Though I don’t always do this myself, I am in favour of people being informed eaters.

5) Vegans take the heat for picky eaters.  If there is a vegan around I know they will make me look good because I won’t be the pickiest eater present.

4) Vegans never add unnecessary cheese or dairy products to recipes. 

3) Vegans never slip shrimp or the other invertebrate seafood into dishes. 

2) If there’s white stuff in a vegan dish I now that it isn’t mayonnaise, and this is good because mayonnaise is the grossest.

1) The best thing about vegans is that they never add honey to recipes as a sugar replacement.  Knowing that I never have to worry about this makes eating vegan deserts a real treat.

A Bunny Watson moment

This past weekend Jeannette took it upon herself to watch the three Peter Jackson Lord of the Rings movies.  Though I am not a fan of these movies, I did end up catching a few minutes here and there.

After watching the movies Jeannette and I were both quite taken with the similarities between the Lord of the Rings story and the Harry Potter story/books.

Of course, this discussion reminded me of the Radiolab piece from a few years ago about Wagner's Ring Cycle. While this piece is mostly about the Ring Cycle, they do discuss some of the similarities between Wagner's work and Tolkien's.



[Embedded audio]

This piece, like most of Radiolab's output, is easy to access and informative.

A Few Quick Notes 556

-I woke up this morning to find a fresh dusting of snow.  Though the snow has since melted, the temperature didn't really rise much above 0.  Of course tonight it is supposed to drop to -10.  And we are to have a little more snow.

-For the past few weeks, basically since we first started getting temperatures close to 0, we have huge humidity problems in our apartment.  Strangely, the humidity seems to be most problematic when it is coldest (in that the water is most prone to condense on our windows during in such conditions).  Fortunately the dehumidifier we bought a few weeks ago has made a substantial improvement.  Though, much to my surprise, even with this piece of equipment running almost constantly we still have so much humidity and condensation that we can't see through some of the windows in our apartment.

This definitely isn't a problem I had in Halifax or Montreal.

-When we moved from Halifax one of the things I had to part with was Neil's Sodastream water carbonating unit.  All of a sudden I was back into the habit of buying 2 litre bottles of carbonated water.

Fortunately, for Christmas Jeannette was thoughtful enough to give me one of these devices.  Since I have had this thing I feel as though I haven't stopped carbonating water.  Though it seem unlikely that I am actually drinking three to four litres of carbonated water a day, I don't think that there are any other reasonable explanations for all of my carbonating.

-Apparently today is the day of the Iowa caucuses. Do you think Obama win?

New/re-branded stuff on the internets

Today marks the launch of the re-branded/organized/titled/conceptualized version of the podcast/public radio show The Sound of Young America now called Bullseye with Jesse Thorn.  As was the case with TSOYA, Bullseye has pop-culture-y interviews and comedy stuff.  Oh, and in the first episode Jesse interviews a few cast members from everybody's favourite costume drama - Downton Abbey.

In honour of this event I thought that I might mention three other things from the internet that are either new or in the process of re-imagining themselves.

1) When Jessica, an early reader of this blog, moved to Korea about two years ago she expressed an interest in engaging in some form of blogging or blogging-like activity to communicate her experiences in her new place of residence.  It seems that the prospect of being "a blogger for the government of Korea" finally motivated her to create her own blog a few weeks ago.  And now that she has been selected by the Korean government to participate in their blogging program she will also be posting on their blog.

3)Andrew, a fellow Brinton Memorial Elementary School alumnus, has also recently started a blog after seeming interested in the prospect for some time.  Andrew's blogging goal is to watch and review at least 365 movies over the course of 2012.  At last count he has posted five such reviews.  If he doesn't watch out me my overrun his goal, and that wouldn't be fun for anyone would it?

3) To get back to the re-branding/imagining theme I first touched on with Bullseye, Jeannette has recently re-imagined her long-ignored Chinafax blog and is now using to document her exploits in the uncharted territory that is veganism in Wolfville.  This one is definitely worth checking out as I even get a shout or two as being someone who is not entirely antagonistic towards such a venture.

I think that just about wraps it up for new things on the internet.  I can't imagine that there might be more than three of them, that would probably be just a little too much for the information super highway to accomodate.

Note: Using 'blog' so many times in a single post makes me feel like a bit of a loser.  Sorry to have tarnished so many fine endeavours with this questionable word.

Did anyone else know about this?

I am currently in the midst of reading a Canadian Parliamentary Review article by former Speaker Peter Milliken.  Though just a few paragraphs into the article I was a little taken aback to find out that while in office Milliken routinely organized dinners for MPs.  According to Milliken

As Speaker of the House of Commons, I made use of a variety of tools, not all of which are found in the Chamber, to allow me opportunities to reinforce the Members’ perception that I was in office as Speaker to serve all regardless of party affiliation. For example, I instituted an ongoing series of dinners to which, in due course, every Member of the House was invited. Members from each of the parties represented in the House were invited to each dinner, always in different groupings. The effect of this was to encourage informal social contact between Members from the different parties with a view to fostering an atmosphere of greater collegiality and, by extension, greater civility in the House.

 Assuming these dinners had the effect Milliken suggests they did and given the relatively raucous nature of recent parliamentary sessions, I wonder how the last parliament would have behaved had these dinners not been held?

Now I know who to blame

For the past few years I have been frustrated by the increasing difficulty I am have when shopping for blocky toothbrushes.  Frequently I have had to settle for toothbrushes with displeasing round handles (they don't fit in so many toothbrush holders and they just look so big and clunky).

While listening to an early episode of 99% Invisible, a podcast I mentioned a few days ago, I finally learned why hunt for the classic boxy toothbrush has become so hard, and why it is likely to stay that way.

 

[Embedded audio]

It seems that someone finally thought about how people actually hold toothbrushes and discovered that the square shape wasn't necessarily best suited to the way most people grip them.  Seemingly overnight most major manufacturers dropped the old design and adopted the new one (Is this not also a major intellectual property issue?).

Of course this happened quietly.  There was no announcement made to indicate that one toothbrush handle style would be phased out and another introduced.  They were there one day and beginning to vanish the next.

Unfortunately, at least as far as I am concerned, I am one of those individuals whose grip style was suited to the classic toothbrush shape (though I don't know if my grip suited the shape or if the shape shaped my grip).

Now, years after the major shift in toothbrush design, I am left hunting for (and hoarding) toothbrushes with the handle style that I like with the knowledge that they are likely soon to be extinct.  With each passing brush the my remaining stash becomes valuable.  And replenishing my stash is becoming harder and harder.

Though it may have several admirable features and fans, like the incandescent lightbulb, the classic blocky handled toothbrush seems to on irreversible march towards oblivion.  And though our numbers may be few, there are at least a few of us who will mourn the passing of these simple bathroom accoutrements.

(Just to be clear, I really do appreciate 99% Invisible's story on design changes to toothbrush handles.  This clears up something I have been wondering about for years.  Furthermore, I don't even bear any ill will to those who have inadvertently lead to the demise of my preferred toothbrush handle shape - they were just trying to come up with a better toothbrush handle shape.  I just wish my preferred style of toothbrush handle hadn't been pushed out of the marketplace.)

Information they don't post in Newfoundland

A few days ago I noticed a CBC story about Newfoundland and Labrador not posting restaurant inspection results for the public to see, and not having any plans to do so in the near future.

At the time my thought was that the implementation of such a scheme would likely be relatively straightforward, particularly because the data already exists (and probably in a relatively accessible way).  Basically all the province would need to do is release it to the public.

Moments ago I happened to be browsing through New Brunswick related web-content and found their restaurant inspection depository.  From what I can tell from this site, it looks as though this process is just about as easy as thought it would be.  I imagine that they have a database that then feeds the site so that the most current reports are displayed and restaurant profiles automatically updated.  Presumably they would have such a database even if they weren't actively providing the information to the public, the internal management of the data would require such a structure.

Perhaps not surprisingly, most of the location being inspected seem to pass quite easily.  Though I was surprised to see some of the infractions.  In particular I was surprised to see infractions that I just wouldn't have really thought likely.

For instance, in at least one case a location was cited or not having refrigerators with thermometers.  Such an infraction immediately raises at least two questions.  Firstly, if fridge thermometers are required wouldn't you expect them to come with fridges?  Secondly, given that these inspections seem to be somewhat regular, how could such an infraction arise in a place that is not new to the food service industry?  Shouldn't such an infraction have been caught almost immediately?

If you examine the inspection report I just linked to you might also see that there seems to sometimes be inconsistency between the broad information provided about the report and the details contained within.  Notably, the report itself suggests that the last inspection was on November 22, 2011 and that the follow-up should be on December 6, 2011.  The higher level information suggests that the last inspection was on November 22, 2011 but that the follow-up inspection should be on January 16, 2012.

One final thing that I found interesting about these New Brunswick restaurant inspection reports is that they seem to either be done in English or French, not in both languages.  Furthermore, one has to open the report to see in which language the report was prepared.